detechfirealarms

DeTech may be closely watching an increasing fire alarm debate because the advent of dual-sensor alarms. There's been much testing carried out the past few decades, simply because the "traditional" ionization smoke detector continues to be ineffective at best and possibly an even better description could be "deadly". Many, many lives happen to be lost in homes equipped with ionization technology, but no known lives are already lost in homes designed with DeTech fire alarms.

Detech fire alarms
In an effort to transition and never hurt feelings or even more likely profits of companies that are deeply engrained inside the fire protection world, there's been much discuss dual-sensor detectors. This isn't according to science, it is based on either politics, ignorance or possibly grounded in money.

Detech fire alarms
Tests of fireside Detection Systems conducted at Texas A&M University, answers the questions because it relates to the performance profile for your two main smoke detection sensors useful for dual smoke detectors. Data collected from this research was utilized to publish a referred article titled: "Risk Analysis of Residential Fire Detector Performance" inside the Journal of Applied Fire Science, Vol.6,109-126.

According to extensive testing of both ionization and photoelectric sensors found in residential smoke detectors, the data collected throughout the research supports several conclusions that should impact the proposed amendment to want dual sensor detectors. First, the problem of false alarms as a result of the ionization process is very well documented. The inclusion from the ionization sensor right into a dual system would increase the probability for false or nuisance alarms. It could also limit installing the dual system because the ionization sensor can't be positioned in areas such as near kitchens or bathroom areas that are susceptible to false or nuisance alarms,

Something documented was the inability from the ionization process to detect a smoldering ignition within an environment without air movement. Even though the ionization sensor surely could detect products of combustion from your flame ignition fire with proper air movement in the detector location, there are much better and reliable smoke detectors with thermo sensors which can be better in detecting a flame ignition fire. Combining these two issues raises a question as to the effectiveness and toughness for the ionization process appropriate for a dual detection system. The investigation documented no real benefit the ionization process offers to detect an ignition source. DeTech fire alarms do contain the recommended thermo sensor, but do not waste money on adding unneeded components or processes that won't increase the life safety factor.

Of the numerous smoke detection systems tested through the studies the photoelectric detection system proved to be a superior detection system, particularly when the internal components included technology including automatic drift sensors to detect sensitivity and adjust the detector to keep up the appropriate sensitivity range. The photoelectric detection process was not prone to false alarms as noted with all the ionization process. DeTech fire alarms incorporate the aforementioned features and many, many more.